In a recent Twitter exchange, former ICE director Tom Homan confronted a fake news reporter, asserting that Mexico has indeed contributed to border security as promised by Trump. Homan highlighted that Mexico has deployed 10,000 military personnel along its borders, effectively saving the U.S. millions in detention costs. This exchange underscores the ongoing debate about border security and the financial implications of immigration policies. For more insights and updates on this topic, follow the conversation on social media, where key figures like Homan are actively discussing these critical issues. Stay informed about border security developments and news.

.@RealTomHoman NUKES a Fake News reporter: “Let’s address that. Trump said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. They have in a roundabout way, have they not? Putting 10,000 military on their northern and southern border… We’re saving millions of dollars every day on detention,… pic.twitter.com/bYJxMmkaz3

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 28, 2025

.@RealTomHoman NUKES a Fake News reporter: “Let’s address that. Trump said Mexico was going to pay for the wall.”

In a recent fiery exchange, former ICE Director Tom Homan took a bold stance against a reporter, asserting that Mexico has indeed contributed to border security, albeit in a less direct way than originally promised by former President Trump. Homan pointed out that while Trump claimed Mexico would pay for the wall, they have, in a roundabout way, invested in security by deploying 10,000 military personnel along their own borders. This statement has ignited discussions about immigration policy and cost savings associated with border enforcement.

They Have in a Roundabout Way, Have They Not?

Homan’s comments raise an interesting point about the complexities of international relations and security. By placing troops on their northern and southern borders, Mexico is taking proactive measures to manage migration flows, which ultimately benefits both nations. The ripple effect of this action means that the U.S. might see a reduction in the number of individuals attempting to cross the border illegally. In turn, this could result in significant financial savings for U.S. taxpayers. According to reports, the U.S. is saving millions of dollars every day on detention costs due to decreased apprehensions.

Putting 10,000 Military on Their Northern and Southern Border

The deployment of 10,000 Mexican troops underscores a commitment to tackling immigration issues collaboratively. It’s a strategic move that reflects a shift in Mexico’s approach to border security, demonstrating that they are serious about controlling their borders. Homan’s assertion highlights the importance of mutual cooperation in addressing immigration challenges. By sharing the responsibility, both countries can work toward a more effective solution that prioritizes security while respecting human rights.

We’re Saving Millions of Dollars Every Day on Detention

The financial implications of these border control measures cannot be ignored. Homan’s assertion that the U.S. is saving millions daily on detention costs is a significant talking point in the ongoing debate over immigration policy. The lessened need for detention facilities and the associated costs can free up resources for other pressing issues within the U.S. This perspective provides a unique angle on what border security can look like when countries cooperate rather than confront each other.

Fake News and the Media’s Role

Homan’s comments also touch on a broader issue regarding media coverage of immigration. The term “fake news” has been thrown around frequently, and this interaction is a prime example of how misinformation can cloud public understanding. Homan’s straightforward rebuttal of the reporter’s narrative serves as a reminder of the need for accurate reporting and the responsibility that comes with it. As audiences consume news, it’s essential to approach information critically and consider multiple perspectives before forming opinions.

In this evolving landscape, where immigration policies are constantly debated, Homan’s remarks serve as a call for clarity and cooperation. Understanding the nuances of these discussions can help foster a more informed public and pave the way for more effective immigration solutions.