BREAKING: Trump Terminates NIH Funding for Harvard

In a significant move, President Trump has terminated the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) $2.2 billion funding for Harvard University. This decision follows a warning from Trump’s Secretary of Education, indicating that the institution’s “woke” policies have made it ineligible for federal grants. Critics argue that Harvard’s shift towards progressive ideologies has detrimental financial implications. The termination of funding raises questions about the future of federal support for higher education institutions perceived as politically biased. This development marks a critical moment in the ongoing debate over educational funding and institutional accountability in the United States.

#BREAKING: President Trump has just TERMINATED NIH’s funding of Harvard, totally $2.2 BILLION

This comes after Trump’s Secretary of Education warned the woke institution they’d be INELIGIBLE for federal grants

Harvard went woke, and now they’ll go broke! pic.twitter.com/TWHWIO3YTn

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 7, 2025

#BREAKING: President Trump has just TERMINATED NIH’s funding of Harvard, totally $2.2 BILLION

In a major shake-up, President Trump has made headlines by terminating the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for Harvard University, which amounts to a staggering $2.2 billion. This decision has sparked a wave of conversations across social media platforms, with many debating the implications of cutting federal support to one of the most prestigious educational institutions in the world. The announcement comes in the wake of actions taken by Trump’s Secretary of Education, who previously warned Harvard that they could become ineligible for federal grants due to their perceived “woke” culture.

This comes after Trump’s Secretary of Education warned the woke institution they’d be INELIGIBLE for federal grants

The warning issued by the Secretary of Education set the stage for this dramatic funding termination. Critics have pointed to Harvard’s increasingly progressive initiatives and policies, labeling them as “woke.” This term has become somewhat of a buzzword in political discourse, often used to criticize institutions that are perceived to prioritize social justice over traditional values. The Secretary’s remarks seemed to resonate with many who feel that the university strayed too far from its academic roots.

This situation raises questions about the future of federal funding for educational institutions that adopt a more liberal stance. With the federal government playing a significant role in financing higher education, the implications of such decisions can be enormous—not just for the institutions involved, but for students and faculty as well. Many are left wondering how this will affect research projects, scholarships, and the overall academic environment at Harvard.

Harvard went woke, and now they’ll go broke!

The phrase “Harvard went woke, and now they’ll go broke!” has emerged as a rallying cry from those who support the decision. It encapsulates a belief that institutions should be held accountable for their ideological leanings, especially when taxpayer money is at stake. Supporters of Trump’s decision argue that by cutting off funding, the government is sending a message that they will not support schools that stray too far from what they consider traditional values.

Critics, on the other hand, argue this could have dire consequences for education and research. Harvard, known for its contributions to various fields, could face substantial setbacks in its ability to fund groundbreaking research and provide scholarships for students from diverse backgrounds. The loss of $2.2 billion in funding is not just a financial blow; it could also hinder the university’s reputation as a leader in higher education.

As the news continues to unfold, discussions around the implications of this funding termination are likely to intensify. Many are closely watching how Harvard responds to this challenge and whether it will affect the institution’s policies moving forward. The broader conversation about the role of federal funding in education, the impact of political ideologies on academic institutions, and the future of research in America is just beginning, and it’s sure to be a hot topic for months to come.

This breaking news highlights the intersection of politics and education, reminding us that the choices made at the governmental level can have far-reaching consequences for the academic landscape in the United States. Whether you support or oppose the funding cut, it’s hard to ignore the ripple effects it could have on one of the nation’s most esteemed universities.