In a recent exchange, Tom Homan decisively challenged a reporter’s claims regarding former President Trump’s assertions about Mexico financing the border wall. Homan emphasized the effectiveness of deploying 10,000 military personnel at the border, stating that this strategy has resulted in significant savings, effectively offsetting the wall’s costs. His remarks highlight the broader discussions surrounding immigration policy and border security in the U.S. This incident not only showcases Homan’s strong stance on the issue but also sheds light on the ongoing debate about funding and resources allocated for national security measures. For more insights, watch the full exchange here.

Tom Homan steps in and absolutely cooks a fake news reporter:

“Let’s address that. Trump said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. Have they not? Putting 10,000 military on the border… We’re saving millions. We’ve more than made up for the cost.”
pic.twitter.com/7zT9JkMt3q

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) April 28, 2025

Tom Homan steps in and absolutely cooks a fake news reporter:

In a recent exchange that has garnered widespread attention, Tom Homan, the former acting director of ICE, took center stage and delivered a powerful response to a reporter’s question regarding the Trump administration’s immigration policies. This moment exemplifies the ongoing debates surrounding the border wall and military presence at the U.S.-Mexico border. Homan’s comments have sparked conversations about the effectiveness and financial implications of these policies.

“Let’s address that. Trump said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. Have they not?

Homan’s retort was direct and unyielding. He challenged the narrative pushed by some media outlets, questioning whether Mexico has indeed fulfilled its promise to contribute to the wall. This statement highlights a significant point of contention in U.S. immigration discourse. Many remember the bold claims made by Trump during his campaign and subsequent presidency about Mexico financing the wall. Critics have often pointed to this promise as unfulfilled, but Homan’s response invites a deeper examination of the financial aspects of border security.

Putting 10,000 military on the border… We’re saving millions.

Homan continued by discussing the deployment of 10,000 military personnel to the border. He asserted that this move has led to substantial savings for the American taxpayer. The deployment of military resources to the southern border is a contentious issue, with supporters arguing it enhances security, while opponents warn of the militarization of border policy. Homan’s perspective brings light to a viewpoint that prioritizes financial prudence while addressing national security concerns.

We’ve more than made up for the cost.

By stating that the costs associated with the wall and military presence have been offset, Homan opens the floor for a critical discussion on government spending and budget allocations. Advocates of stringent border security often argue that the investment in these measures is justified by the potential for long-term savings and enhanced safety. Homan’s remarks suggest a belief in the efficacy of these policies, which resonates with a significant portion of the American public who prioritize security over the criticisms of funding.

The Impact of Media Narratives

This exchange serves as a reminder of the power of media narratives in shaping public opinion. Homan’s ability to “cook” the reporter indicates a broader trend where figures in the political sphere are pushing back against what they perceive as biased reporting. The phrase “fake news” has become a rallying cry for many who feel misrepresented or misunderstood by mainstream media. As discussions around immigration continue to evolve, the role of media in framing these narratives remains crucial.

For those looking to delve deeper into the ongoing debates surrounding immigration, border security, and the impacts of media, Homan’s comments provide a starting point for understanding the complexities involved. As political conversations unfold, it’s important to stay informed and engaged, considering multiple perspectives on these pressing issues.