In a recent tweet, Donald J. Trump revealed that 83% of USAID programs have been eliminated after a six-week review. This bold move raises questions about the future of foreign aid and its implications on international relations. The tweet invites public opinion, asking followers whether they support this decision with a simple “YES or NO” response. As the debate over the effectiveness of USAID continues, this significant reduction could spark discussions on government spending and priorities. Stay informed about the evolving landscape of U.S. foreign aid and engage in the conversation surrounding this controversial decision.

JUST IN: After a 6 week review, 83 % of USAID programs have now been eliminated.

Do you support this?

YES or NO? pic.twitter.com/p4spitn5Uz

— Donald J. Trump (Daily News) (@TrumpRealDaily) May 4, 2025

JUST IN: After a 6 week review, 83 % of USAID programs have now been eliminated.

In a recent announcement that’s making waves across social media, it’s been reported that after a thorough six-week review, a staggering 83% of USAID programs have now been eliminated. This revelation was shared by Donald J. Trump via Twitter, igniting a flurry of discussions and debates on the implications of such a drastic cut to international aid. It’s a bold move that raises questions about the future of foreign assistance and America’s role on the global stage.

Do you support this?

The question now is, do you support this? YES or NO? The elimination of such a large percentage of USAID programs could drastically change the landscape of international aid. Supporters of the cuts argue that reducing foreign aid could help reallocate resources within the United States, prioritizing domestic issues over international commitments. On the other hand, critics warn that this could hinder crucial support for developing countries, many of which rely heavily on U.S. assistance for health, education, and economic development.

The Impact of Eliminating USAID Programs

With 83% of USAID programs now off the table, the immediate impact on global aid initiatives is hard to ignore. Programs that focus on critical areas such as health care, poverty alleviation, and education may face significant setbacks. For instance, USAID has been instrumental in fighting diseases like HIV/AIDS and malaria in Africa. Eliminating these programs could reverse years of progress made in these regions. It’s essential to consider how these cuts will affect the lives of millions who depend on this assistance.

Public Opinion on USAID Cuts

As the announcement spreads, public opinion is divided. Some view the cuts as a necessary step towards fiscal responsibility, while others see them as a dangerous retreat from America’s humanitarian obligations. Engaging in a dialogue about these changes is crucial. How do you feel about the government’s decision? Are you in favor of prioritizing domestic issues, or do you believe that maintaining international aid is vital for global stability?

The Future of USAID

Looking ahead, the future of USAID remains uncertain. With such significant cuts, there may be a shift in how the U.S. engages with the rest of the world. Critics argue that abandoning these programs could undermine America’s influence and leadership in international affairs. Additionally, the potential for increased global instability is a pressing concern that cannot be overlooked.

Engaging in the Conversation

As we ponder the implications of these cuts, it’s essential to engage in the conversation. Share your thoughts on whether you support the elimination of 83% of USAID programs. It’s a pivotal moment that could redefine how the U.S. interacts with global partners. Your voice matters in shaping the future of foreign aid and international relations.

To keep the discussion going and see more perspectives, check out [Trump’s Tweet](https://twitter.com/TrumpRealDaily/status/1919045738664718672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) and join the conversation with friends and family. Remember, understanding different viewpoints can help foster a more informed and balanced discussion on such crucial issues.